A Higher View of Scripture

Beyond defending the Bible to encountering the God who speaks through it


I have long wondered whether our modern conversation about biblical inerrancy sometimes asks too small a question. “Is Scripture without error?” is certainly a legitimate theological question. But answering it does not, by itself, tell us what Scripture is for – or what kind of book it is. We can affirm its inspiration and still approach the Bible primarily as a repository of correct information, theological propositions, or moral teachings.

Maybe a higher view of Scripture begins somewhere else: not with Scripture as an object to defend, but with Scripture as the living, God-breathed means through which God encounters his people. Hebrews says that “the word of God is living and active” (Hebrews 4:12). Paul describes Scripture as theopneustos – “God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16). And Jesus can speak of an ancient text as something God is saying to people in the present (Matthew 22:31–32). The words were written long ago, but the voice is still heard.

That perspective also helps explain something distinctive about the Bible itself. God did not give us a neat theological textbook. He gave us four Gospels, each with its own emphases. He gave us Samuel and Kings alongside Chronicles. He gave us Job, Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, and Psalms – voices that sometimes seem to conflict with one another. He gave us lament alongside praise, questions alongside answers, and people who argue with God. Scripture contains tension, poetry, ambiguity, memory, story, wisdom, prayer, and mystery.

Maybe mystery is not a defect in revelation. It may be one of its main characteristics. Biblical truth is not always something we can reduce to a tidy system. Scripture can be clear and mysterious at the same time. We can know something truly without being able to explain it exhaustively. The fact that Scripture sometimes leaves us wrestling may be part of how it forms us.1

This is why we want to distinguish between a text’s meaning and its continuing significance. Psalm 23 had a historical and literary meaning for ancient Israel. But when someone reads “The LORD is my shepherd” beside the bed of a dying spouse, the significance of those words can become almost unimaginably larger. The words have not changed, and their original meaning has not disappeared. Rather, the living God has brought an ancient word into a new moment, a new circumstance, and a new human heart.

So when we say that God continues to speak through Scripture, we do not mean that God keeps changing what Scripture means or that we can make the text say whatever we want. The words remain. Their meaning matters. But the Spirit who inspired Scripture also illumines it. Scripture can address us, confront us, comfort us, unsettle us, and transform us in ways that cannot be reduced to extracting information from the page.

Perhaps the irony is that a genuinely high view of Scripture may make us less anxious about defending it. If the Bible’s authority depends upon our ability to resolve every apparent difficulty, we may feel compelled to protect it. But if Scripture is the living, God-breathed word through which God encounters his people, we can afford to sit with it. We can allow Job to remain uncomfortable, Ecclesiastes to unsettle us, the Psalms to teach us how to lament, and the Gospel writers to emphasize different things. We can even say, “I don’t know,” without believing that Scripture has failed.

The real question, then, may not simply be, “What does the Bible say?” That question is essential. But alongside it is another: “What is God saying to us through what the Bible says?” The second question must never be detached from the first. Yet the first alone can reduce Scripture to information.

And perhaps this is the deepest point: the goal of Scripture is ultimately not Scripture. The goal is God. Jesus told people who searched the Scriptures diligently that those very Scriptures testify about him (John 5:39). The Bible is not ultimately a book designed to make us better at knowing the Bible. It is a book through which we come to know the One to whom the Bible points.

A high view of Scripture may not be one that makes Scripture smaller, neater, and easier to control – but one that allows it to remain alive, mysterious, and capable of speaking into every generation.


1 Jacob had to wrestle with God to know God and to understand himself, and mostly his own limitations (Genesis 32). It’s also possible that our “wrestling with Scripture” is what we need to encounter God and to come to terms with our own (mental, philosophical, intellectual, spiritual) limitations. (Offered by Kevin Thomas, September 2026)

Note: I wrote this a couple of months ago. It seemed fitting to publish it in light of Jesus and the Law.

How do we know…?

It was the mid-1980s, a couple years after discovering I wasn’t the Good Samaritan. I had taken some Young Life kids to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in Northern Minnesota for stress camping, hoping it would stretch their developing faith. It did just that, but I felt the experience was still a bit self-focused. So we decided in subsequent years to take kids out of their comfort zones into a serving capacity. What we did was a precursor to today’s mission trips. Our first trip was to Haiti. Our second trip was to Kansas City, MO, to work with Habitat for Humanity. The third trip was back to KC, helping a large, white, urban church re-purpose some underutilized space. They wanted to create a community ministry to their neighbors, including the construction of space for a food pantry.

To set up the trip, I visited the church to see what work needed to be done and to begin planning for the project (I convinced them, as an engineer, I could serve as the project foreman). During the trip, I spent much of my time with the pastor. He had a significantly different worldview than I did – enough that I knew I could/should learn from him. Still trying to figure out how to navigate and interpret scripture in an exegetical manner, I asked him, “How do we know how to interpret scripture properly? After all, we have been at this a lot of years, yet we seem to have a lot of differing opinions.” His response was transformative…

He reminded me that scripture should always be interpreted in context. (I knew this already, as did most people I suspected.) He went on to remind me that the broader the context, the better. (I think I knew this as well, but wasn’t sure how to do it practically.) The broadest possible context for interpretation, he suggested, is the entire Word of God – the whole Bible. (My first thought was, “Serious? How is that even practicable?”) Then he made a statement that sent chills through my body…

“And always remember,” he said, “the Word became became flesh (John 1, 14). If what you are reading doesn’t line up with Jesus’ words and deeds, then there is something else going on in the passage.” This resonated with me. This was such good news. I could wrap my head around the concept that all scripture needed to align with the Word that became flesh, with Jesus. This made scripture reading and honest attempts at interpretation possible and practical.

That was about 35 years ago. The adage that all scripture needs to align with Jesus has served me well all these years. Do I still have questions about the paradoxes presented in scripture? Absolutely! (Maybe even more questions as I get older.) But this I can rest on – with Jesus as my standard, I can live with the paradoxes. Why? The paradoxes drive me back to Jesus and the more time I spend with Him, the more I understand what God is up to. And the more time I spend with Jesus, the more my mind is shaped, allowing for transformation (Romans 12:2) – I actually start to become like him (Philippians 2:5-11).

The Opposite of Eisegesis…

Old habits are hard to break. After living in Red Wing, MN, for seven years we moved to Memphis, TN, at my company’s urging (meaning, my job moved to the corporate headquarters in Memphis). After moving, I still needed to return to Red Wing periodically for factory visits. It was a bit odd staying at the local Best Western located a mile from our old home.

During one visit, after a long day at the factory, I headed to the hotel in my rental car. I drove right past the Best Western to our old house, unaware of the mistake until I drove down the street and saw unfamiliar cars in the driveway. Old habits are hard to break.

Last week I introduced the term eisegesis (ˌī-sə-ˈjē-səs), which is the reading of a text through the lens of what we already believe to be true. The word eisegesis literally means “to lead into,” meaning we speak into the text our preconceptions. The opposite? Exegesis (ek-sə-ˈjē-səs). The word exegesis literally means “to lead out of,” meaning the reader allows the intent the text to “come out,” informing his or her beliefs.

I suspect we have been in the habit of reading scripture though the lens of our preconceptions for so long that we drive right by exegesis and end up at eisegesis. The Good Samaritan parable might be adequate proof of that reality. We have been flying upside down a long time as Dallas Willard would remind us. So, how do we get right-side up? First, we recognize we are at the wrong house, change our mind, and head the other direction (this is the definition of repent). Then we rethink how we approach Scripture. Here are a few simple questions to ask as we invite Scripture to speak into our lives:

  • What stands out to me? How might God be trying to grab my attention?
  • What is being said in this passage?*
  • What is NOT being said? (This is a biggie)*
  • What does this passage tell me about who God is?
  • What does this passage tell me about who I am?
  • So what? What am I to do with these thoughts? How might God be asking me to change my mind?

There are plenty of other questions we could address, but this is a good start. It takes practice. Anyone that has played a sport knows of what I speak. Changing a swing, serve, stroke, or stride takes time, effort, and thought until it becomes second nature. Same with the shift from eisegetical to exegetical Scripture reading. But when it does become second nature, Scripture comes to life, transforming our lives! (See 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and Romans 12:2)

* Case is point: Several years ago I was meeting weekly with a group of college-age young people. We were working our way through the Gospel of John. When we arrived at the well-known John 3:16 (For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life), I asked them to close their Bibles (or Bible Apps) and paraphrase the verse. They collectively thought the verse was about them going to heaven. None of them saw the word world. None! (And they were also a bit surprised to discover that heaven is not the same thing as eternal life, but we’ll save that topic for another time.)