Uncategorized – Page 2 – Practical Theology Today

Nazareth and the Hidden Years of Jesus

If Galilee was the wider landscape of Jesus’s early life, Nazareth was its heart. Tucked away in the hill country of Lower Galilee, this small, unassuming village became the home of the One through whom God would redeem the world. Yet for thirty years – three decades of mostly silence – Jesus lived an ordinary life in an ordinary place. The Gospels tell us almost nothing of those years, and perhaps that quiet is itself the point – an unassuming Messiah from an unassuming village.

A Village Off the Map

Nazareth barely registered on the radar of ancient historians. Josephus, who chronicled the Galilean region in detail, never mentioned it. Neither did the Hebrew Scriptures nor early rabbinic writings. It was, by all appearances, a backwater – a tiny agricultural settlement, perhaps 60 to 100 people at most, perched on the lower slopes of the Galilean hills. Archaeological excavations suggest that simple homes were constructed of stone and mudbrick, featuring small courtyards, cisterns, and terraced fields. Life there revolved around family, faith, and the daily labor required to survive.

The village lay only a few miles from Sepphoris, a bustling Greco-Roman city rebuilt by Herod Antipas as his regional capital.¹ The contrast was striking: Sepphoris boasted colonnaded streets, mosaics, theaters, and trade, while Nazareth remained a rural hamlet. Yet the proximity mattered. Many scholars suggest that Joseph, described as a tekton (craftsman or builder), may have found work in Sepphoris.² If so, Jesus likely accompanied him, learning the rhythms of labor, the smell of wood and stone, and perhaps hearing Greek spoken in the market.

Growing Up in the Margins

When Nathanael in John’s Gospel asked, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” (John 1:46), he voiced what many thought. Nazareth was small, obscure, and geographically removed from the centers of power and learning. Yet it was precisely there that the Son of God grew up – in a community of faith, humility, and hard work.

Nazareth’s people were devout Galileans. They attended the local synagogue, observed the Sabbath, kept the feasts, and recited the Shema: “Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4). The home was the first classroom of faith. Parents taught Scripture orally, embedding the commandments of God into daily life: “Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road” (Deut. 6:7).

Jesus’s formative years, then, would have been steeped in the rhythms of Jewish life – work, worship, and family. He learned not in palaces or academies, but in the carpenter’s shop and synagogue school, where boys memorized the Torah and learned to pray the Psalms.

Young Jesus in the Temple, Heinrich Hofmann, 1881

Silence and Preparation

The Gospels are notably quiet about these years. Luke’s brief summary is all we have: “And the child grew and became strong; he was filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was on him” (Luke 2:40). A few verses later, Luke adds, “And Jesus grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man” (Luke 2:52).

That’s it – no miracles, no speeches, no recorded events – just steady growth in body, wisdom, and divine grace. The silence itself speaks volumes. The Son of God entered fully into human development, living an authentic human life. Before he taught in synagogues, he listened in one. Before he proclaimed good news to the poor, he worked among them. Before he called others to follow him, he learned obedience at home.

This long hidden season reminds us that God is often at work in obscurity. The kingdom’s story began not in spectacle but in ordinariness. Jesus’s waiting years were not wasted years. They were the years in which humility, patience, and wisdom were forged – the quiet formation before public calling.

The World Around Him

During those years, Galilee continued under Herod Antipas’s rule, marked by Roman presence, economic strain, and cultural mixture. Sepphoris became a regional hub of administration and trade. Roman roads improved communication across the Galilee, bringing both opportunity and temptation. The reach of the empire was never far. Yet Nazareth remained poor, agrarian, and pious, largely insulated from the bustle of Hellenistic cities.

The synagogue in Nazareth would have been the center of its communal life. Archaeological evidence from similar Galilean villages suggests a simple rectangular building with benches along the walls – a place for Scripture reading, prayer, and local gatherings.³ It was likely here that Jesus first stood to read Isaiah’s prophecy: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me…” (Luke 4:16-20). That later moment in his ministry was the unveiling of what had been forming in silence all along.

Faith in the Ordinary

Nazareth challenges our assumptions about significance. The Savior of the world did not grow up in Jerusalem among priests and scholars but in a village of farmers and builders. He did not attend elite schools or dine with rulers. He lived the life of a villager – working with his hands, obeying his parents, learning the Scriptures, and worshiping in the local synagogue.

When he finally stepped into public ministry, his words and actions bore the imprint of those hidden years: his parables drawn from soil and seed, his compassion for the poor, his reverence for the Father, his knowledge of the Scriptures. All of it was shaped in Nazareth’s quiet hills.

The hidden years of Jesus remind us that God’s redemptive work often begins unnoticed. Nazareth teaches that faithfulness in the small things matters – that obscurity can be sacred ground. Before the crowds and miracles, there was waiting, working, and growing. And perhaps the most astonishing truth of all is this: God Himself once lived a humble village life, sanctifying the ordinary and making it forever extraordinary.

And in this, we get a glimpse of the nature of God’s Kingdom

References

Josephus, Antiquities 18.27; War 2.511.
Kenneth E. Bailey, Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes (IVP Academic, 2008), 32–34.
Lee I. Levine, The Ancient Synagogue: The First Thousand Years (Yale University Press, 2000), 40–46.

Galilee: The Area From Whence Jesus Emerged

When one imagines Galilee at the time of Jesus’s birth, we picture a land of rolling hills, small towns and villages, agricultural fields, and fishing boats on the lake – peaceful! But the region was quietly humming with political tension, social unrest, and economic strain. It was not quite the tranquil countryside one sometimes envisions, but a place with deep roots in Jewish tradition, a mixed cultural environment, and a client-kingdom relationship with Rome.

A Charged Political Climate

Galilee was under the rule of the Herodian dynasty (see the previous blog post) as a client territory of the Roman Empire. After the death of Herod the Great (4 BC), his kingdom was divided. His son Herod Antipas became tetrarch of Galilee (and Perea), ruling for more than forty years.¹ Because Galilee was under a Herodian ruler rather than a direct Roman procurator (as was Judea, the region around Jerusalem), it retained a somewhat different feel from Judea proper.

Even so, Roman influence loomed large. Taxation, censuses, and imperial oversight shaped the daily experience of Galileans. Into that climate stepped Judas the Galilean. According to the book of Acts, Judas “rose up in the days of the census and drew away many people after him” (Acts 5:37). The historian Flavius Josephus also recorded the event. He described a man named Judas – called Gaulonite or Galilean – from the town of Gamala. Together with a Pharisee named Sadduc, Judas urged the people to resist the Roman census, insisting that submission to Rome was tantamount to slavery.²

Josephus considered this movement the beginning of a “fourth philosophical sect” among the Jews, alongside the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes.³ This so-called Fourth Philosophy emphasized God alone as Israel’s ruler and rejected Roman taxation. The uprising was quickly suppressed, but it left a mark: Galilee was no stranger to resistance. Beneath the apparent calm, it carried the simmering tension between Roman control and Jewish longing for deliverance.

Galilee, then, was not merely a peaceful backdrop for Jesus’s childhood – it was a politically charged region, where national identity, economic burden, and hope for God’s kingdom intertwined.

Life Beyond Jerusalem

Culturally, Galilee stood at a crossroads. Its population was predominantly Jewish, speaking Aramaic and holding fast to ancestral customs. It was surrounded by Gentile territories – the Decapolis to the east, Phoenicia to the northwest. This mixture gave Galilee a unique texture: deeply Jewish, yet more open to outside influences than Jerusalem or Judea. It was, in many ways, Israel’s frontier – viewed by some southern Jews as less pure or refined.

Villages and small towns dotted the landscape, most clustered around fertile valleys or near the Sea of Galilee. Family and kinship formed the backbone of daily life. People worked hard to survive – farmers, fishermen, tradesmen, and laborers – many living at or near the subsistence level. Archaeological and historical studies suggest that nearly nine out of ten Galileans lived close to the poverty line, burdened by taxes and rents demanded by both local elites and Roman authorities.⁴

The Synagogue: A People Gathered

For Jews living far from Jerusalem, the synagogue was the heartbeat of community life. In places like Galilee, the Golan, and the Decapolis, it served as the local center of worship, study, and belonging. Few could afford the long pilgrimage to Jerusalem except on major feast days, but the synagogue kept the rhythms of faith alive in daily life.

While the Temple in Jerusalem was the only place for sacrifice, the synagogue was the place for Scripture. Its roots reached back to the Babylonian exile, when the people of God—displaced and without a temple – gathered to read the Law and pray. By the first century, synagogues dotted the landscape of Palestine. Archaeologists have uncovered remains in Gamla, Magdala, and Capernaum – towns where Jesus himself would one day teach.

In Galilee, the synagogue was far more than a house of prayer. It was a schoolhouse, a meeting hall, even a courthouse. Each Sabbath, the community gathered to hear the Torah and the Prophets read aloud, followed by teaching or discussion. We see this reflected in Luke’s account of Jesus reading from Isaiah in the synagogue at Nazareth (Luke 4).

Outside of worship, it remained the place where disputes were settled, announcements made, and stories shared. For those who lived far from the Temple, the synagogue brought God near. It grounded faith not in distant ritual, but in shared life—where Scripture was heard, lived, and passed on from one generation to the next.

Work and Livelihood

Economically, Galilee benefitted from its fertile soil, regular rainfall, and proximity to the lake. Agriculture formed the backbone of the economy: wheat, barley, olives, grapes, and figs were staples. Fishing was another major livelihood, particularly around towns like Capernaum, Bethsaida, and Magdala.⁶ The fishing industry supported not just fishermen but also boatbuilders, net weavers, and merchants who salted or dried fish for trade.

Yet despite these resources, Galileans were far from affluent. Heavy taxation, land consolidation by wealthy elites, and debts often kept small farmers in a cycle of dependence. The Roman imperial system funneled much of the region’s productivity upward, leaving many families one poor harvest away from ruin.⁷

A Region Ripe for Hope

Putting it all together, Galilee at the time of Jesus’s birth was a land both blessed and burdened. It was rich in soil and tradition, yet pressed under Roman taxation. It was politically restless and spiritually expectant. Synagogues kept faith alive in small communities far from the Temple, while stories of resistance – like Judas the Galilean’s revolt – whispered of freedom and God’s kingship.

And into this world – rural, devout, weary, and waiting – Jesus was born. Long before his ministry began, he was shaped by the rhythms of Galilean life: the prayers of the synagogue, the struggles of ordinary laborers, and the quiet hope of a people longing for God’s redemption.

References

Josephus, Antiquities 17.188–189.
Ibid, 18.4–10.
Ibid, 18.23–25.
Justin K. Hardin, “The Socio-Economic World of Jesus,” HTS Theological Studies 72(4), 2016.
Lee I. Levine, The Ancient Synagogue: The First Thousand Years (Yale University Press, 2000), 40–46.
Sean Freyne, Galilee, Jesus and the Gospels (Fortress Press, 1988), 55–63.
Richard Horsley, Archaeology, History, and Society in Galilee (Trinity Press, 1996), 102–104.

Between Testaments: Israel’s Tumultuous Path to the First Century

The Maccabean Revolt marks one of the most dramatic turning points in Jewish history. It was a period charged with both tragedy and triumph, when faith and identity collided with political power and cultural assimilation. The revolt began in 167 BC under the oppressive rule of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, but its ripples extended far beyond the immediate battles. From the courageous uprising of the Maccabees to the eventual Roman conquest in 63 BC, this chapter of Israel’s history illustrates how God’s people navigated the tension between devotion to Him and the pressures of empire.

Sparks of Revolt

The Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes had attempted to stamp out Jewish religious practice by desecrating the Temple, outlawing Torah observance, and forcing pagan sacrifices (see the previous blog post). These acts lit the fuse of resistance. When the king’s officials demanded that Mattathias, a priest in the Judean town of Modein, offer sacrifice to Zeus, he refused – and struck down the apostate Jew who was willing to comply. His defiance launched an armed movement.

Mattathias’ sons, especially Judas Maccabeus, carried forward the cause. Judas earned the nickname Maccabeus – “the Hammer” – for his ferocity in battle. Using guerrilla tactics, he and his followers struck Seleucid garrisons, routed larger forces, and reclaimed Jewish towns. What drove them was not only national pride but also a holy zeal to preserve covenant faithfulness.

“Machabeusze”, a depiction of the revolt by 19th-century Polish artist Wojciech Korneli Stattler.

Cleansing and Rededication

By 164 BC, Judas and his men retook Jerusalem and cleansed the desecrated Temple. The altar, defiled by pagan sacrifices, was rebuilt, and the Temple rededicated to the worship of the Lord. This moment is remembered in the Jewish festival of Hanukkah, the Feast of Dedication, commemorating the miracle of God’s provision and the victory of His people.

The restoration of the Temple was not just about reclaiming a building. It was about reasserting that Israel’s identity flowed from her covenant relationship with Yahweh, their God. To lose the Temple was to lose the visible sign of God’s presence. To rededicate it was to declare that He was still faithful and that His people would be faithful in return.

Expansion and Struggles

The Maccabean movement did not end with Judas. His brothers, Jonathan and Simon, continued the fight. Jonathan took on both religious and political roles, serving as high priest while leading military campaigns. Simon later secured greater independence for Judea and was hailed as both leader and priest.

This family’s leadership inaugurated what became known as the Hasmonean dynasty. For the first time in centuries, the Jewish people experienced relative self-rule. The dynasty expanded territory, reclaimed lands once held under David and Solomon, and even forced neighboring peoples to adopt Jewish customs. Apparently turnabout was fair play.

But with success came new challenges. The blending of priestly and political authority raised questions about legitimacy. Some Jews, especially the later sects like the Pharisees and Essenes, resisted the Hasmoneans, criticizing their corruption and compromises. What had begun as a fight for purity of worship risked being entangled in political power struggles.

Sects and Partisanship

It was during this period that Judaism began to splinter into recognizable sects. The Pharisees emphasized strict observance of the Law and oral tradition, hoping to safeguard Israel’s holiness. The Sadducees, largely from priestly and aristocratic families, were more aligned with the Temple and political elite. The Essenes, disillusioned by corruption, withdrew into desert communities, awaiting God’s intervention. The Zealots, later on, embodied the revolutionary spirit of the Maccabees, insisting on violent resistance to foreign domination. Partisanship dominated the scene.

These divisions reflected deeper questions: What does it mean to be God’s people under empire? How do you remain faithful when rulers are hostile, or when your own leaders falter?

The Shadow of Rome

The Hasmonean dynasty’s growing ambitions drew the attention of larger powers. Civil strife between rival claimants to the throne created an opening for Rome, the newly rising empire in the Mediterranean world. In 63 BC, the Roman general Pompey entered Jerusalem. According to ancient sources, he even walked into the Holy of Holies – an act of sacrilege that left deep scars in Jewish memory.

From that point forward, Judea existed under Roman oversight. Though the Hasmoneans still held nominal authority for a time, true power resided in Rome’s hands. Eventually, Rome installed client kings, like Herod the Great, who reigned with splendor but also cruelty.

Between Revolt and Hope

The period from the Maccabean revolt to Rome’s conquest was one of paradox. On one hand, it was an age of heroic faith: ordinary men and women risking everything to keep God’s law and worship Him alone. On the other hand, it exposed how fragile human leadership can be, how quickly zeal can become corrupted by political power.

Yet, within this turbulent story, God was preparing the stage for something greater. The Temple had been cleansed, but it pointed beyond itself to a greater cleansing to come. The dynasty had restored independence, but it revealed the limits of self-selected human kingship.

As Roman control solidified in Judea, messianic expectations intensified. Many anticipated a divinely appointed leader who would reestablish Israel’s sovereignty and expel its foreign oppressors.

The story from the Maccabees to Rome is not just political history; it is spiritual history. It shows a people struggling to remain God’s people in the face of foreign oppression, internal corruption, and cultural pressures. It shows the high cost of faithfulness and the dangers of compromise. And most importantly, it set the stage for Jesus, who would enter a world of divided sects, Roman rule, and longing hearts to announce: The kingdom of God is at hand.

Between Testaments: From Persia to Antiochus Epiphanes

We have been journeying through the Hebrew Scriptures, following the story of God and the people he called to participate in his new creation project. Now we come to the close of the Old Testament, with the Persian Empire in control. The temple had been rebuilt, the walls of Jerusalem restored, and life in Judea had some semblance of normalcy.

Yet even then, the people of God were waiting. Malachi’s voice lingered in the air: “Behold, I will send my messenger, and he will prepare the way before me” (Malachi 3:1). Then, the long silence began. No prophet arose. No fresh word from the Lord was recorded. And yet history marched on – for 400 years it marched on. These so-called “silent years” were filled with upheaval, empires, and longing.

Persia and the Seeds of Stability

Persia’s rule was relatively kind compared to the Babylonian captivity that preceded it. Cyrus the Great had allowed the exiles to return home. By the time Malachi’s ministry ended (around 430 BC), the Jewish people were a small but distinct community within a vast empire. The temple was functioning, priests led worship, and the high priest served as the de facto leader of the people.

It was during this time that Aramaic spread as a common language. The synagogue became increasingly important as outposts of teaching, prayer, and Scripture reading, especially for Jews scattered throughout the empire. These developments would shape Jewish life for centuries.

But the Persian Empire would not last. To the West, a young Macedonian general was gathering power.

Enter Alexander the Great

In 332 BC, Alexander the Great stormed through the Near East, defeating Persia and bringing Judea under Greek control. With him came Hellenism – the spread of Greek language, culture, and thought. At first glance, this seemed a gift. Greek opened doors of communication across the known world. Trade, ideas, and learning flourished. For the Jewish people, however, Hellenism was both opportunity and threat.

On one hand, the Greek language made possible the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. Jews living far from Jerusalem could hear the Word of God in a language they understood. Even later, the apostles would quote from this translation as they preached the gospel across the Roman world.

On the other hand, Greek culture pressed against Jewish identity. Gymnasiums, theaters, and Greek philosophy all carried values foreign to the covenant. Some Jews eagerly embraced these innovations, seeking to fit in with their neighbors. Others resisted, determined to keep the law of God intact. The seeds of division between “Hellenizers” and “traditionalists” began to sprout.

3rd century BC bust of Alexander from Alexandria, Egypt

Ptolemies and Seleucids

After Alexander’s sudden death in 323 BC, his empire fractured. Two dynasties battled for control of Judea: the Ptolemies in Egypt and the Seleucids in Syria. For roughly a century, the Ptolemies held sway. Life under them was generally peaceful, and the Jewish people enjoyed a degree of autonomy.

But in 198 BC, everything changed. The Seleucid king Antiochus III (sometimes called “the Great”) defeated the Ptolemies and took Judea under his control. At first, he treated the Jews favorably, even granting privileges to the temple. But the Seleucid grip tightened with his successors, and cultural tensions grew sharper.

The Rise of Antiochus IV Epiphanes

By 175 BC, the Seleucid throne passed to Antiochus IV, a man who gave himself the title Epiphanes – “manifest one,” as if he were a god revealed. To many Jews, however, he was nicknamed Epimanes—“the madman.”¹

Antiochus was determined to impose Greek culture on all his subjects. To him, unity meant uniformity, and local traditions, including Jewish worship, were obstacles to be eliminated.

The pressure was immense. Some within Jerusalem’s priesthood compromised, even bribing their way into the high priesthood and introducing Greek customs into temple life. Josephus records bitter disputes between Jewish leaders, with some willing to Hellenize and others clinging to the covenant. Division tore at the fabric of Israel.

The Temple Crisis

The breaking point came in 167 BC. Antiochus issued decrees outlawing circumcision, Sabbath observance, and Torah reading. Sacred scrolls were burned. Mothers who circumcised their sons were executed. The covenant itself was under attack.

Worst of all, Antiochus desecrated the temple. He set up an altar to Zeus in the holy place and sacrificed swine upon it – an unthinkable act of defilement.²

In the Hellenistic world, rulers like Antiochus sought to unite their subjects under Greek religion and culture. The pig sacrifice was his way of saying, “Your God is powerless. Your distinctiveness is finished.” But history would prove otherwise. What he meant for humiliation became a spark of holy defiance. Josephus would later call this the breaking point – the moment when desecration provoked devotion, when unclean blood on the altar stirred a people to cleanse the sanctuary once more.

Waiting in the Silence

For centuries, Israel had waited for God’s promises to be fulfilled. Now, in the face of Antiochus’ brutality, many must have wondered: Had God abandoned them? Why had the prophetic voice gone quiet? Where was the Lord who once shook Mount Sinai and split the Red Sea?

And yet, even in the silence, God was preparing. The crisis under Antiochus would awaken a fierce zeal for the covenant and spark a revolt that changed the course of Jewish history. It would also deepen the longing for deliverance, the ache for the Messiah.

The intertestamental period reminds us that even when God seems silent, He is never absent or powerless. It’s a reminder that Yahweh is the King [capital “K”] of kings. Though other kings might want to capitalize on their kingship, they are in fact [small “k”] kings in God’s economy.

Next time: We’ll turn to the Maccabean revolt, the Hasmonean dynasty, and Rome’s eventual conquest – a turbulent path that sets the stage for the coming of Christ.

¹ Polybius, Histories 26.10 (fragment); cf. Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae 5.193, who notes that contemporaries mockingly called Antiochus Epimanes (“the madman”) instead of Epiphanes (“the manifest one”). See also Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 12.5.4 (§239–241), and 2 Maccabees 9:5–10 for accounts of his deranged conduct and divine punishment.

² 1 Maccabees 1:47–50; cf. 2 Maccabees 6:4–5; Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 12.5.4 (§252–253).

Rebuilding What Was Lost: Ezra, Nehemiah, and the God Who Restores

The people of God knew what it meant to lose everything. Jerusalem was in ruins, the temple was ashes, and the people had been carted off to Babylon in humiliation. Decades passed. A generation grew up in exile,* remembering only in stories the songs of Zion and the glory of Solomon’s temple. When the exile finally lifted and the return began, their task was clear but overwhelming: rebuild. Rebuild their homes, rebuild their city, rebuild their temple, rebuild their life with God.

It is in this season that we meet Ezra and Nehemiah – two leaders who carried the weight of restoration on their shoulders, but in different ways. Ezra, the priest and scribe, devoted himself to restoring worship and the teaching of God’s Word. Nehemiah, the cupbearer turned governor, devoted himself to rebuilding the city’s walls and restoring its strength. Both men lived in the tension of hope and hazard. Both knew that what they built was far more than stone and timber; it was a testimony that God had not abandoned His people.

Ezra and the Temple: Restoring Worship

The first wave of exiles returned under Zerubbabel, rebuilding the altar and eventually completing the Second Temple around 516 BC. It was nothing like Solomon’s grand temple, but it was a place where sacrifices could be offered and the presence of God honored. When Ezra arrived some decades later, the Second Temple already stood, but worship had become compromised. People had intermarried with surrounding nations, idolatry lingered at the edges, and the Word of God had been neglected.

Ezra’s mission was not just about stone and mortar – it was about hearts. Scripture describes him as a man who “set his heart to study the Law of the LORD, and to do it and to teach his statutes and rules in Israel” (Ezra 7:10). He called the people back to covenant faithfulness, sometimes with tears, sometimes with stern confrontation. His leadership shows us that rebuilding life with God is not only about physical structures but about returning to obedience and worship.

Ezra faced resistance, of course. Neighboring peoples mocked the efforts of the returned exiles, writing letters to Persian kings to halt the work. Within Israel, there was compromise and half-heartedness. Some resisted his calls to repentance. Yet, slowly, through public reading of the Law and renewed devotion, Ezra helped re-center the people on God.

Nehemiah and the Walls: Restoring Strength

If Ezra carried the priest’s burden, Nehemiah carried the builder’s grit. Serving as cupbearer to King Artaxerxes, he heard word that Jerusalem’s walls lay in ruins and its gates burned. His response? He wept. He fasted. He prayed. And then he risked everything by asking the king for permission to return and rebuild.

When he arrived, he found a city vulnerable and exposed. A city without walls was a city without security, dignity, or identity. Nehemiah walked the ruins at night, surveying the broken stones, and then rallied the people: “You see the trouble we are in… Come, let us rebuild the wall of Jerusalem, and we will no longer be in disgrace” (Neh. 2:17).

But the work was not easy. Opposition sprang up quickly. Leaders like Sanballat and Tobiah ridiculed the project: “What are these feeble Jews doing? … If even a fox climbs up on it, he will break down their wall of stones!” (Neh. 4:2–3). Their mockery turned to threats, and the builders worked with one hand on the stone and the other on their swords. Hazards came from without and within: enemies plotted attacks, while discouragement and fatigue weighed heavily on the workers.

Nehemiah demonstrated true leadership in those moments. He stationed guards, encouraged the weary, and reminded them that the work was God’s. He called out corruption, confronted injustice among the nobles, and kept his own life free of greed. Through sheer perseverance and faith, the wall was completed in just 52 days – a feat that even their enemies had to admit was possible only because “this work had been accomplished with the help of our God” (Neh. 6:16).

The Attitudes of the People

Ezra and Nehemiah both encountered a spectrum of reactions. Some rejoiced at the rebuilding. When the temple’s foundation was first laid, younger voices shouted for joy while older ones wept, remembering the glory of Solomon’s temple (Ezra 3:12). There was excitement and sorrow mingled together—the joy of restoration and the ache of what had been lost.

Others resisted, either through apathy or hostility. Some within the community were more concerned about their own houses than God’s house. Others opposed the reforms that called for sacrifice or repentance. And of course, enemies outside of Israel actively tried to sabotage the work.

Yet through it all, the people gathered. They took their places on the wall. They listened to Ezra read the Law for hours on end, standing in the hot sun. They confessed their sins together. They signed a covenant renewal. The story of Ezra and Nehemiah is not simply about two leaders but about a community that, with all its imperfections, rose to the occasion and chose to hope in God’s promises.

God’s Faithful Restoration

The stories of Ezra and Nehemiah are about more than ancient history. They remind us that God is in the business of restoration – He always has been, He always will be until the “renewal of all things” (Matt. 19:28). His people may stumble, cities may fall, worship may grow cold – but He stirs leaders, awakens communities, and rebuilds what was broken.

Ezra reminds us that restoration begins with returning to God’s Word and realigning our lives with His will. Nehemiah reminds us that God calls us to action, to pick up stones, to stand watch, and to persevere in the face of opposition. Together, they paint a picture of faith that is both spiritual and practical, both inward and outward.

And perhaps the most important lesson? The temple and the walls, as important as they were, pointed to something greater. Generations later, Jesus would walk those same streets, declaring Himself the true temple (John 2:19) and the Good Shepherd who protects His people.

The story ends where ours begins: with a God who restores, a people who return, and a future secured not by stone walls or earthly temples, but by the presence of Christ, through the Holy Spirit, among us.

* Exile: think “eviction.” In I Almost Bought the Farm, we discussed that the land, the Promised Land, belonged to God, and His people resided there at His pleasure.

Isaiah’s Kingdom Message

We would be remiss in this “kingdom journey” if we didn’t spend time with Isaiah and his 60-year ministry as a prophet. His prophetic voice rang out in one of Israel’s darkest seasons. His book spans decades of judgment, grief, promises, and breathtaking visions of God’s kingdom breaking in.

Isaiah’s ministry began in the eighth century B.C. during the reign of Uzziah (Isaiah 6:1). He served as a prophet in Jerusalem, speaking to kings and common people alike. His call was both daunting and exhilarating as he announced God’s word to a people who largely did not want to hear it. He saw firsthand their idolatry, injustice, and false worship. He warned them that Assyria, and later Babylon, would be instruments of God’s judgment.

Isaiah was not simply a prophet of doom. He was also a prophet of hope. His message unfolds in a rhythm of judgment and restoration, not an uncommon theme in the Hebrew scriptures. Israel would be cut down like a tree, but “the holy seed will be the stump in the land” (Isaiah 6:13). In other words, God’s kingdom story and the role of his people were far from over.

Isaiah in the Shadow of Exile

Isaiah straddled a critical time in Israel’s history. Some of his prophecies addressed the immediate threat of Assyria, but his vision stretched far beyond. He foresaw Babylon’s rise and the devastating exile that would follow (Isaiah 39:5–7). For Judah, this meant the unimaginable: the temple destroyed, the land lost, the people scattered.

What do you say to a people stripped of their identity and hope? Isaiah’s answer was to re-anchor them in the character of God. He reminded them that the Holy One of Israel was not confined to stone walls or earthly thrones. Even in exile, God was King.

“Comfort, comfort my people, says your God” (Isaiah 40:1). These words echo like cool water in the desert. Isaiah dared to declare that exile was not the end. God was still writing the story, still keeping covenant, still shaping a people for Himself. The kingdom would come, not by human might but by God’s own faithful hand.

The Prophet Isaiah, Michelangelo (1509, Sistine Chapel)

The Kingdom Vision

Isaiah’s prophecies pulse with kingdom language. He envisioned a day when swords would be beaten into plowshares, and nations would learn war no more (Isaiah 2:4). He pictured a highway in the wilderness, where God Himself would lead His people home (Isaiah 35:8–10). He described a feast of rich food for all peoples, where death is swallowed up forever (Isaiah 25:6–8).

These aren’t just nice images. They are glimpses of God’s reign breaking into human history. Isaiah insisted that God’s kingdom is not limited to Israel’s borders – it is global, cosmic, and eternal.

But who could possibly bring such a kingdom?

Pointing to the King

Isaiah repeatedly pointed forward to a figure who would embody and establish God’s reign. Sometimes he called Him the shoot from Jesse’s stump, a Spirit-filled ruler who delights in righteousness and justice (Isaiah 11:1–5). Other times, He is the Servant of the Lord, who suffers on behalf of His people, bearing their sins to bring them peace (Isaiah 53:4–6).

For Christians, these words unmistakably point to Jesus. He is the child born, the son given, the one called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace (Isaiah 9:6). He is the Servant who was pierced for our transgressions and crushed for our iniquities. He is the Spirit-anointed King who announces good news to the poor and freedom for the captives (Isaiah 61:1–2; see Luke 4:18–21).

Isaiah, centuries before Bethlehem, gave Israel a vocabulary of hope that would only make full sense in Jesus.

Kingdom People Then and Now

Isaiah’s voice continues to call out across the centuries. His message to exiles is just as relevant to us. We may not be dragged off to Babylon, but we know what it is to live in a fractured world where kingdoms rise and fall, where injustice festers, and where hope feels fragile.

Isaiah’s kingdom vision re-centers us. It reminds us that our story is not defined by loss or despair but by the faithful God who keeps His promises. It challenges us to live as kingdom people even in exile (both real and perceived) – to pursue justice, to care for the oppressed, to keep our eyes fixed on the coming King.

The same King that Isaiah saw in the temple, high and exalted, with the train of His robe filling the sanctuary (Isaiah 6:1), is the King who took on flesh and walked among us. He is the crucified and risen Lord who promises, “Behold, I am making all things new” (Revelation 21:5).

Living Isaiah’s Hope

To read Isaiah is to be both unsettled and comforted. We are unsettled by his honesty about sin, judgment, and the futility of our false securities. But we are comforted by his relentless insistence that God is faithful, that exile is not the end, and that a King has come – and will come again.

Like the exiles who first heard Isaiah’s words, we are invited to trust, to wait, to hope. To beat our swords into plowshares in anticipation of peace. To walk the highway of holiness with joy. To live as witnesses to a kingdom that is already here and yet still to come.

Isaiah helps us see what’s true: God is King, His kingdom is and has broken in, and Jesus is the fulfillment of the promises. And in that kingdom we find our home.

Prophets in a Foreign Land: God’s Voice in Babylon

Continuing the conversation of the last post, God’s People in Exile…

As we discovered, the Exile was disorienting. The old markers of identity were gone – the land, the temple, the city, the king. For Judah, exile in Babylon was not just a political defeat; it was a theological crisis. Who were they now? Did God abandon them? Was His covenant promise broken?

It was in this crucible that the prophets spoke. Their words were not simply predictions of future events, but God’s active voice, calling, warning, reminding, and comforting His kingdom people in a foreign land. If we listen carefully, we hear how God was reshaping His people – not in the glory of Zion, but in the dust of Babylon.

Jeremiah: Faithfulness in the Long Haul

Jeremiah is often remembered as the weeping prophet, the man who mourned the fall of Jerusalem. Yet in his letters to the exiles, he provided a surprising word: “Build houses and live in them; plant gardens and eat their produce… seek the peace of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf” (Jeremiah 29:5, 7).

This was not a pep talk about a speedy return. In fact, Jeremiah told them the exile would last seventy years (Jeremiah 29:10). God was not offering escape but faithfulness. He was teaching His people how to live when the outward signs of His kingdom seemed absent.

It’s striking that God’s command was not withdrawal, but engagement. Settle in. Plant. Build. Marry. Have children. Work for the flourishing of Babylon itself. In other words, even in exile, Israel’s vocation as God’s people did not change. They were still called to be a blessing among the nations (Genesis 12:3). It’s the stuff “love your enemies” comes from.

Ezekiel: God’s Glory on the Move

Ezekiel’s prophetic visions must have startled his fellow exiles. His first encounter – a storm wind, living creatures, wheels within wheels, a blazing throne – was a revelation that God’s glory had not been left behind in Jerusalem (Ezekiel 1). The unthinkable was true: the God of Israel was not bound to the temple. He was with His people, even in Babylon.

That vision redefined holiness. Exile stripped away the illusion that God lived only in stone buildings. It showed that His presence is mobile, transcendent, and faithful. Yet Ezekiel also confronted the people with the reason for exile: their rebellion, idolatry, and covenant unfaithfulness. He dramatized their sin with street theater and symbolic acts – lying on his side, shaving his head, packing up like an exile.

But Ezekiel’s message was not only judgment. He spoke of a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 36), of God breathing life into dry bones (Ezekiel 37). In exile, God was not just punishing – He was remaking His people from the inside out.

Daniel: Living as a Witness in the Empire

Unlike Jeremiah and Ezekiel, Daniel’s story unfolds inside Babylon’s palaces. His life was less about spoken prophecy and more about embodied testimony. Refusing to defile himself with the king’s food (Daniel 1), interpreting dreams (Daniel 2), and standing firm in the face of lions and fire (Daniel 3, 6), Daniel demonstrated that allegiance to God could survive – and even thrive – under foreign rule.

Daniel’s visions reminded the people that the empires of this world are temporary. Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome – they rise and fall. But “the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that shall never be destroyed” (Daniel 2:44). In exile, this was a daring reminder: God’s kingdom was not defeated. It was eternal.

Lamentations: Learning to Grieve

Alongside these prophetic voices, we hear the raw lament of the book aptly titled Lamentations. It is poetry soaked in grief: “How deserted lies the city, once so full of people!” (Lamentations 1:1). Yet woven into the sorrow is a line that anchors hope: “Because of the Lord’s great love we are not consumed, for his compassions never fail” (Lamentations 3:22).

God’s people were learning that lament is itself a form of faith. To cry out in anguish is to believe that someone is listening. Even in exile, grief became a way to remain tethered to God.

What God Was Saying in Exile

Taken together, the prophets give us a fuller picture of God’s voice in exile:

Live faithfully where you are. Exile is not an excuse for disengagement. God calls His people to seek the peace of the city – even foreign cities.
My presence goes with you. God’s glory is not tied to geography. He is present in palace and prison, in temple and tent, in Jerusalem and Babylon.
Your identity is intact. Though stripped of land and temple, Israel remained God’s covenant people. Exile was discipline, not abandonment.
The future is mine. Empires rise and fall, but God’s kingdom endures. The exile was not the end of the story – it was a chapter in God’s ongoing plan.
Grief is a language of faith. To lament is not weakness but worship, acknowledging both the pain of loss and hope in God.

Exile and Us

We, too, live as exiles. The New Testament picks up this theme, calling followers of Jesus “sojourners and exiles” (1 Peter 2:11). We belong to a kingdom not of this world, yet we dwell within it.

The prophets remind us that exile is not spiritual silence. God still speaks, calling His people to faithfulness, presence, and hope. He calls us to bless our neighbors, to live distinctly yet compassionately, to remember that our true citizenship is in His kingdom.

Exile strips away illusions, but it also clarifies identity. It reminds us that God’s presence is not confined to buildings or borders. He is with us wherever we are – and He is shaping us, even in “foreign soil,” to be His kingdom people.

God’s People in Exile

The story of Judah’s (southern Israel) exile at the hands of the Babylonians is sobering. It’s not simply about military defeat or displacement – it’s about the covenant people of God learning to live out their calling in a foreign land under foreign gods. The exile is one of the most formative periods in Israel’s history, shaping their identity, faith, and hope in ways that still resonate with us today.

The Fall of Jerusalem

The Babylonian Empire, under King Nebuchadnezzar II, rose to dominance in the early 6th century B.C. Judah was caught in the geopolitical squeeze between Babylon and Egypt, often trying to maneuver for survival. But repeated rebellions against Babylon’s authority provoked Nebuchadnezzar’s wrath.

In 597 B.C., Jerusalem was besieged for the first time. King Jehoiachin surrendered, and Nebuchadnezzar carried off the young king, members of the royal family, military leaders, and skilled craftsmen (2 Kings 24). This first wave of deportees included a young man named Ezekiel, who would later become one of the most significant prophets of the exile.

A decade later, in 586 B.C., Jerusalem fell completely. After a long and brutal siege, the Babylonians broke through the walls, burned the temple, destroyed the palaces, and left the city in ruins (2 Kings 25). It was a devastating moment – the loss of the temple was not just architectural, it was theological. The house of Yahweh, the visible reminder of God’s presence among His people, lay in ashes.

The *Etemenanki* of ancient Babylon. It was a massive ziggurat dedicated to the god Marduk in ancient Babylon.

Who Was Taken – and Who Was Left

Nebuchadnezzar’s strategy was shrewd. He carted off the best and brightest – the ruling elite, warriors, artisans, and priests. These were the people who could rebuild resistance or inspire rebellion. By removing them, Babylon weakened Judah’s future capacity for independence.

Those left behind were mostly the poor, farmers, and common laborers. To Babylon, they posed little threat. They were left to work the land and provide tribute. But to the exiles, it meant the land of promise was still inhabited – though stripped of its glory. The remnant in Judah and the exiles in Babylon were now two halves of the same broken nation, both struggling to make sense of what had happened.

Geographically, the exile meant a complete shift in worldview. Babylon was far to the east, across the desert, in the lush river valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates. The exiles were now surrounded by imposing ziggurats, walls that dwarfed anything in Jerusalem, and gods whose images dominated public life. Babylon was not just another city—it was the embodiment of human power and pride, the antithesis of Zion.

Stories from Exile

Exile life was not uniform. Some exiles, like Daniel and his companions, found themselves in positions of influence within the Babylonian court. Their stories remind us that even in a foreign land, God’s people could bear witness to His covenant faithfulness – his hesed. Daniel’s refusal to defile himself with the king’s food (Daniel 1), his friends’ fiery trial (Daniel 3), and Daniel’s prayer life that landed him in the lions’ den (Daniel 6) show us that faithfulness was possible under pressure.

Ezekiel’s visions along the Kebar River (Ezekiel 1) revealed that God’s presence was not bound to the temple in Jerusalem. The vision of the wheels and the glory of the Lord on the move proclaimed that Yahweh was not defeated. He had gone into exile with His people.

Psalm 137 gives us another angle – the deep anguish of the exiles. By the rivers of Babylon we sat and wept when we remembered Zion. The grief was real. They wrestled with questions of identity: Who are we without the temple? Who are we without the land?

God’s Directives in Exile

Into this confusion came a remarkable word from the Lord through the prophet Jeremiah. Writing from Jerusalem to the exiles in Babylon, he delivered God’s surprising directive:

“Build houses and settle down; plant gardens and eat what they produce. Marry and have sons and daughters… Increase in number there; do not decrease. Also, seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper.” (Jeremiah 29:5–7)

This was not the message they wanted. Many longed for a quick return, a short captivity. False prophets promised just that. But God was clear: exile would not be over in a year or two. It would be a season of seventy years (Jeremiah 29:10).

In that season, the people were not to withdraw in bitterness or plot rebellion in secret. They were to live faithfully as God’s kingdom people in a foreign land. They were to put down roots, raise families, and bless the city of their captors. In other words, they were to embody God’s covenant life even in exile.

Kingdom People in a Foreign Land

The exile became a crucible for Judah’s faith. They discovered that God was still with them. His kingdom was not bound to geography or to buildings. His people could live for Him anywhere, under any circumstances, if they clung to His word, trusted His promises, and bore witness through obedience.

The exile reminds us of a larger truth: God’s people are always, in some sense, “resident aliens.” Whether in Babylon or in our own cultural moment, we are called to live distinctly, faithfully, and with hope – even when the world around us feels hostile or foreign.

The Temple: God’s Dwelling Place Among His People

When we think of the Temple in Jerusalem, it’s easy to imagine it as just another impressive ancient building with ornate stonework, golden decorations, and sacred rituals. Most cultures in the ancient Near East had temples. From Egypt to Mesopotamia, from Canaanite shrines to Babylonian ziggurats, temples were everywhere. They were designed to house the presence of the gods, to be places where heaven and earth touched.

Israel’s Temple was different.

From Tabernacle to Temple

The Temple wasn’t Israel’s first “house of God.” In the wilderness, God instructed Moses to build the tabernacle (Exodus 25–31). This portable sanctuary, crafted with careful instructions and exact measurements, was the meeting place between God and His people. Its very design taught theology: the Holy of Holies symbolized God’s throne room, the ark His footstool, and the altar His provision for forgiveness.

And behind it all was the Biblical covenant refrain: “I will take you as my own people, and I will be your God” (Exodus 6:7). The tabernacle was God’s visible way of saying, “I’m not a distant deity. I dwell with you, because you are mine.”

When Israel settled in the land, King David longed for a permanent place where God’s presence would rest. As he looked out from his cedar palace in Jerusalem, he was struck that the ark of the covenant still dwelled in a tent (2 Samuel 7:1-2). His desire was honorable – he wanted to build a house worthy of Yahweh.

But God said no.

Why David Was Not the Builder

God’s response to David was layered. First, He reminded David that He had never asked for a house – He was the One who had always been on the move with His people. Second, God turned David’s request upside down: instead of David building God a house, God promised to build David a “house” – a dynasty through which His kingdom would be established forever (2 Samuel 7).

Upside down. Another Biblical theme.

Another reason, Scripture notes, is that David was a man of war, his hands stained with blood (1 Chronicles 28:3). If they were to have a temple, God wanted it to be built by a man of peace – Solomon. But even more, God wanted to remind Israel: “I am the One who builds. I am the One who establishes.“

Temples Then and Temples Now

On the surface, Solomon’s Temple resembled other temples of its time: a sacred inner chamber, priestly rituals, sacrifices, and an emphasis on order and beauty.

But the distinction was profound. Pagan temples were built to contain an image of the pagan god with a carved idol that embodied the deity’s “presence.” In contrast, Israel’s Temple was built for the presence of the living God Himself. No idol sat in the Holy of Holies – only the ark of the covenant, a symbol of God’s throne. And when Solomon dedicated the Temple, God’s glory, in a theophany, filled the house like a cloud (1 Kings 8:10–11). Yahweh Himself took up residence.

Temple Theology 101

The Temple stood as more than an architectural marvel. It declared foundational truths about God and His kingdom:

God dwells with His people. The Temple embodied the covenant promise: “I will be your God, and you will be My people.”
God is holy. Access to His presence was carefully ordered, with layers of increasing sanctity leading to the Holy of Holies.
God provides atonement. Sacrifices reminded Israel that sin separates humanity from God, and blood was necessary for forgiveness.
God reigns as King. The Temple was His throne room in Jerusalem, reminding Israel they were His covenant people under His rule.

The Temple wasn’t just a religious building – it was a kingdom declaration.

The Greater Temple: Jesus Christ

Yet the Temple was never the ultimate goal. It was a shadow pointing forward to something greater. When Jesus arrived, He referred to Himself as the true Temple: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). In Him, God’s presence didn’t merely dwell in stone walls, but it walked among us in flesh and blood. The Word became flesh and tabernacled among us (John 1:1`4, AMPC).

Paul captures this beautifully in Colossians 1:15: “The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.” Unlike the pagan temples with their carved images, Jesus Himself is the true image of God. He is not a symbol but the reality – God’s presence embodied fully.

And through Him, the covenant refrain takes on its deepest meaning: because of Jesus, God can say to Jew and Gentile alike, “I will be your God, and you will be My people” (2 Corinthians 6:16).

Dwelling with God Forever

From tabernacle to Temple to Christ, the story is one of God’s presence with His people. What began as a tent in the wilderness finds its completion not in stone, but in a Person – and ultimately, in a city where God Himself will dwell with humanity forever: “God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God.” (Revelation 21:3).

The Temple reminds us that God’s desire has always been to take up residence with His people. And in Jesus, that desire has been fulfilled in ways far greater than David or Solomon ever imagined.

Kingdom Divided: Good Kings, Bad Kings, and the Road to Exile

When we last left the story of God’s kingdom people, David had passed the crown to his son Solomon. David’s reign was far from perfect, but he was remembered as “a man after God’s own heart.” Solomon, with his legendary wisdom and his building of the temple, seemed poised to continue that legacy. Yet the seeds of division were already being sown.

Solomon loved the Lord (1 Kings 3:3), but he also loved foreign wives and their gods (1 Kings 11). His compromises fractured the nation spiritually, and after his death, the kingdom literally split in two: Israel in the north and Judah in the south (1 Kings 12). From this point forward, the biblical story of the monarchy becomes a tale of two nations, each with its own kings, prophets, triumphs, and failures.

Two Thrones, Two Paths

The northern kingdom of Israel had nineteen kings in total, beginning with Jeroboam I. Not a single one is described in Scripture as faithful to the Lord. Jeroboam set up golden calves so the people wouldn’t go to Jerusalem to worship (1 Kings 12:28–30), and every king after him walked in his idolatrous footsteps. Though some were politically successful or militarily strong, spiritually the nation was on a steady downward slope.

Judah, on the other hand, had twenty kings. Most were unfaithful, but a handful are remembered as “good” – not because they were flawless, but because they sought the Lord and led reforms. Kings like Asa (2 Chronicles 14), Jehoshaphat (2 Chronicles 17), Hezekiah (2 Kings 18), and Josiah (2 Kings 23) stand out as bright lights in a darkening landscape. They tore down idols, reinstituted temple worship, and called the people back to covenant faithfulness.

Still, even the “good” kings were inconsistent. Joash started well under the guidance of the priest Jehoiada, but later abandoned the Lord (2 Chronicles 24). Amaziah “did what was right in the eyes of the Lord, but not wholeheartedly” (2 Chronicles 25). Uzziah was faithful for most of his reign but became proud and overstepped his authority in the temple (2 Chronicles 26). The chronicler doesn’t whitewash the record; he shows us leaders who were mixed bags – a bit like us?

The Prophetic Warnings

Throughout these centuries, God did not leave His people without a voice. Prophets like Elijah and Elisha, Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, Micah, and Jeremiah spoke truth to kings and nations. They confronted idolatry, called out injustice, and reminded the people that covenant blessings were tied to covenant faithfulness (Deuteronomy 28).

But most of the time, the prophets were ignored – or worse, persecuted. Think of Elijah standing alone on Mount Carmel, calling Israel to choose between the Lord and Baal (1 Kings 18). Think of Jeremiah weeping as his warnings fell on deaf ears (Jeremiah 9). Again and again, the prophets said: Return to the Lord, or exile is coming.

Patterns of Faithfulness and Rebellion

Reading through 1 and 2 Kings or 2 Chronicles, we see a pattern emerge. A king rises to power. If he does evil, the nation slides further into idolatry. If he does good, there’s often a brief reprieve, a season of reform, but it rarely lasts. With the next generation, the pendulum swings back toward rebellion.

The northern kingdom never once turned the tide. Every king “did evil in the sight of the Lord.” After centuries of warning, God allowed Assyria to conquer Israel in 722 BC (2 Kings 17). The ten northern tribes were scattered, never to return in the same form.

Judah limped along for another 135 years. Good kings gave the nation moments of hope, but the general trend was downward. Finally, under the weight of idolatry, injustice, and stubborn rebellion, God allowed Babylon to destroy Jerusalem in 586 BC (2 Kings 25). The temple was burned, the walls torn down, and the people carried into exile.

Why This Matters

It’s tempting to read this history as ancient political drama, but I think Scripture invites us to see something deeper. The story of Israel and Judah is the story of human hearts. Left to ourselves, we tend to drift toward idolatry. We start well and falter. We follow God for a season but slip back into self-reliance, pride, or compromise.

The kings of Israel and Judah remind us that leadership matters, but more importantly, they remind us of our need for the greater King. David pointed toward Him (2 Samuel 7:12–16). Solomon’s wisdom hinted at Him (Matthew 12:42). The prophets longed for Him (Isaiah 9:6–7). And though the line of kings failed (which, remember, the people asked for), God promised a Son of David who would reign forever in justice and righteousness (Jeremiah 23:5–6). That King is Jesus.

Living in the Tension

So what do we do with this mixed record of good and bad kings? Perhaps we’re meant to sit in the tension. To acknowledge both the warnings and the hope. The warnings show us the cost of disobedience: exile, loss, brokenness. The hope points us to the faithfulness of God, who never abandons His people even in their rebellion (Lamentations 3:22–23).

The exile was not the end of the story. God brought His people back (see Ezra and Nehemiah), rebuilt Jerusalem, and in the fullness of time, sent His Son (Galatians 4:4-5). The line of David was never truly broken; it was fulfilled in Christ.

As we reflect on the divided kingdom, maybe a takeaway is this: our faithfulness wavers, but God’s faithfulness never does…

If we are faithless, he always remains faithful. He cannot deny his own nature. (2 Timothy 2:13, Phillips).

We don’t need another human king to save us. We already have One who has conquered sin and death, who reigns forever, and who invites us to live as citizens of His unshakable kingdom (Hebrews 12:28).